The threat of cybercrime for businesses cannot be understated, cybercrime in the past decade has seen a sharp increase, causing significant financial and reputational damage to businesses in Australia and all around the world. This threat has led to businesses choosing to prioritise uplifting their information security. To meet this need there are several frameworks and standards that help businesses create or enhance their cybersecurity program that covers all facets of their information security. ISO 27001 and APRA CPS 234 are two such examples, each designed to meet a particular set of needs. So what are their differences? Before we can delve into their differences it is important to understand what each of them is and the purpose they serve.
ISO 27001 is a globally recognised standard for information security. It allows for your business to equip itself with a risk-based approach to information security that is internationally accepted as best practice.
One of the key ways it achieves this is through the introduction of an Information Security Management System. An ISMS assists businesses in identifying, assessing, mitigating, and managing the risks involved in managing corporate information. Implementing an Information Security Management System is one of the most important methods of securing your organisation’s intellectual property, financial data, and third-party or employee information.
An ISMS is a combination of processes and policies that help you identify, manage, and protect your sensitive data against external threats. The ISMS’s main objective is to make sure that the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of your company’s data and information are maintained.
Achieving ISO 27001 certification proves to your customers and partners that your business is committed to achieving an international standard of information security. The certification helps towards improving the trust customers are comfortable putting into your business and is a huge differentiating factor amongst competitors.
Lock Down Your Cybersecurity & Compliance
Protect, Certify & Grow Your Business
Build resilient governance practices that can adapt and strengthen with evolving threats. Speak to an expert
ISO 27001 takes a risk-based approach to information security. This approach requires organisations to identify risks that may be detrimental to information security and then select appropriate controls to mitigate them.
Those controls are outlined in Annex A of the Standard. ISO 27001:2013 listed 114 Annex A controls, divided into 14 control domains. The current edition, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, has 93 Annex A controls grouped into four themes, and ISO 27001:2013 certifications expired or were withdrawn when the transition period ended on 31 October 2025:
| Theme | Controls | Examples of what it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Organisational | 37 | Information security policies, roles, supplier relationships, incident management, business continuity and compliance |
| People | 8 | Screening, terms of employment, security awareness and training, and remote working |
| Physical | 14 | Physical perimeters and entry, equipment protection and storage media |
| Technological | 34 | Access and authentication, malware protection, backup, logging, network security and secure development |
When checking for ISO 27001 compliance, certification auditors will take a look at controls under each theme.
To assist organisations in protecting themselves from cybercrime the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) created a standard for information security management called APRA CPS 234, which has been in force since 1 July 2019. This standard is designed to help APRA-regulated entities increase their overall resilience towards information security incidents that can affect the confidentiality, integrity or availability of information assets.
The CPS 234 requires APRA-regulated entities to:
Cyber-attacks remain a persistent and costly threat, as malicious actors are getting more sophisticated and ingenious in their methods of compromising information assets of organisations. Organisations in the finance industry have become especially lucrative targets for these criminals due to the high amount of financial reward and access to personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) that these organisations hold.
This trend has been helped by lacklustre information security and an overreliance on the use of technology and third-party vendors by superannuation, banking and insurance companies, in an attempt to increase customer satisfaction and operational efficiency. In consequence, internal and external stakeholders have increased their expectations when it comes to securing information assets, as well as calling for an increase in importance given to promoting information security within the organisation as a whole.
CPS 234 can help APRA-regulated entities to reduce cyber risk and increase their overall cyber security posture by ensuring that their information security takes into account their vulnerabilities and threats. The CPS 234 also ensures that organisations give more attention to vendor risk management so that incidents involving third parties are reduced.
CPS 234 applies to all APRA-regulated entities. These include:
It is important to note that since 1 July 2020, CPS 234 has also applied in full to information assets managed by third parties: an APRA-regulated entity must assess the information security capability of any related party or third party that manages its information assets.
CPS 234 also applies to certain foreign entities, for their Australian branch operations. These include:
A key difference between the two standards is the way that they are enforced, on one hand, businesses can get ISO 27001 certification and are required to renew their certification every 3 years, with regular surveillance audits during this period. On the other hand, CPS 234 does not have a certification, instead, APRA has a range of formal and non-formal enforcement tools at their disposal. Non-formal approaches include working in cooperation with companies to identify and rectify problems before they threaten the ability of that company to meet its promises. However, APRA is prepared to take enforcement action when appropriate – including court-based action or directing companies to take or cease particular actions.
Another key distinction between the two standards is who they apply to, while ISO 27001 is globally recognised, APRA created the CPS 234 standard to meet the growing need for cybersecurity uplift amongst businesses in the financial services industry, therefore it is a requirement that is specific to APRA regulated entities, whereas ISO 27001 is a much broader information security standard that is more thorough and applies to business across industries, regardless of size, type and location.
In conclusion, apart from the two differences outlined above it is difficult to compare the two standards as they both are designed to uplift an organisation’s information security. CPS 234 does not require ISO 27001 certification, but many of its requirements overlap with the clauses and controls outlined in the ISO 27001 standard. Therefore businesses that are already certified to ISO 27001 generally have an easier time meeting the requirements outlined in CPS 234.
Whether you are looking to achieve ISO 27001:2022 certification or need help meeting APRA CPS 234’s key requirements, StickmanCyber is here to help. We have worked with organisations across Australia and New Zealand since 2006, and our consultants are certified as ISO 27001 Lead Auditors and Lead Implementers.
The First Step is Crucial. Start with a Cybersecurity Assessment
Where are you at your cybersecurity maturity journey? Get an assessment of your current security posture and identify the gaps and challenges that you need to act upon. Start an assessment
No. ISO 27001 certification is useful evidence of a well-run information security management system, but on its own it does not demonstrate CPS 234 compliance. CPS 234 adds specific obligations, such as making the board ultimately responsible for information security, notifying APRA of material incidents within 72 hours and assessing the information security capability of third parties that manage information assets.
Yes, for APRA-regulated entities. CPS 234 is a binding prudential standard that has applied to Australian banks, insurers, private health insurers and superannuation trustees since 1 July 2019. ISO 27001, by contrast, is voluntary: organisations choose to be certified, often because customers, partners or tenders ask for it.
Service providers are not regulated by APRA directly, but CPS 234 still reaches them. A regulated entity must assess the information security capability of any related party or third party that manages its information assets, and its internal audit function reviews the controls those parties maintain. Providers to Australian banks, insurers and super funds are therefore often asked to evidence their security controls.
CPS 234 does not set a fixed interval. It requires a systematic testing program whose nature and frequency match factors such as how quickly vulnerabilities and threats change, the criticality and sensitivity of the information assets and the consequences of an incident. Testing must be done by appropriately skilled and functionally independent specialists, and the program must be reviewed at least annually.
The transition period to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 ended on 31 October 2025, and certificates issued against the 2013 edition expired or were withdrawn at that point. Organisations now certify to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which ISO amended in 2024 to add climate action changes, and their Statement of Applicability must refer to the 93 Annex A controls of the 2022 edition.
APRA’s CPS 230 Operational Risk Management took effect on 1 July 2025 and sets updated requirements for operational risk, business continuity and service provider management. It sits alongside CPS 234 rather than replacing it: CPS 234 still governs information security, while CPS 230 covers the wider resilience of critical operations, including material service providers.